Home » About K12 complaints » Glossary
goalpost shifting
Goalpost shifting refers to situations where the requirements for resolving a concern or accessing support keep changing. Families may be asked to complete a series of tasks—provide documentation, attend meetings, try new strategies, or wait for additional assessments—only to find that once one step is completed, a new requirement is introduced before any meaningful support is provided. Each request may appear reasonable on its own, but the cumulative effect can keep families in an ongoing process without resolution. In education advocacy, goalpost shifting can occur when schools delay implementing supports while continuing to ask parents for more information or additional steps. This can leave children struggling in the meantime while families invest significant time and energy trying to meet moving expectations. Recognising goalpost shifting can help families and schools refocus on the central question: what support or change is needed now to ensure the student can safely and meaningfully access their education. Also see bait and switch.
-
What if the school says “this is just how we do things”?
Institutional normalisation is not a legal defence, and it is not a satisfactory answer. “This is our practice” is one of the most common responses families receive when they challenge something a school has been doing for a long time without…
-
Can I pursue more than one complaint pathway at the same time?
Yes. Many families assume they must choose one path and exhaust it before opening another. In reality, different pathways address different dimensions of the same harm, and pursuing them in parallel is not only permitted — it is often strategically essential.…
-
What’s the risk of waiting too long to escalate a complaint?
The biggest risk is not conflict. It is lost options. BC’s formal complaint pathways carry hard deadlines that run whether or not you are aware of them. A human rights complaint must generally be filed within one year of the last…
-
What does procedural unfairness look like in BC schools?
Procedural unfairness is about how decisions are made, not just what decisions are reached. Common examples include: Procedural unfairness matters because it is reviewable. Bodies like the Ombudsperson do not re-decide educational policy — they assess whether the process was fair, transparent, and…
-
How do I know if advocacy has turned into a time trap?
Advocacy becomes a time trap when it consumes increasing amounts of energy while producing diminishing returns. Parents often describe this as constantly preparing: drafting emails, gathering documentation, attending meetings, following up, waiting — only to find themselves back where they started.…
-
When does “be patient” become a red flag rather than reasonable advice?
Patience is often framed as a virtue in school advocacy. In reality, it can quietly become a mechanism for delay. Patience is reasonable when there is a clear plan, defined timelines, and visible progress. It becomes a red flag when time…
-
What’s the difference between raising a concern and making a formal complaint?
Schools often blur this distinction, and that ambiguity benefits the institution more than the family. Raising a concern is informal. It might be a conversation with a teacher, an email to a principal, or a meeting where issues are discussed but…
-
How do I know if what’s happening at school is serious enough to complain about?
Many parents hesitate to complain because they’re unsure whether what they’re seeing is “bad enough.” We all know that schools are underfunded and that classrooms are struggling. Schools rely on that uncertainty. The truth is that most serious problems don’t arrive…
-
Solving problems at school: institutional harm patterns
This page addresses the patterns of institutional behaviour that compound the original harm — gaslighting, information withheld, goalpost shifting, advocacy punished as aggression, and tone policing — and the complaint pathways available when the system’s response to your concern becomes a…
-
Solving problems at school: accommodation and IEP failures
When a school fails to accommodate a disabled child, it rarely announces the failure plainly. The accommodation does not arrive; the IEP goal sits unimplemented through term after term; the education assistant’s hours are quietly reduced without consultation; the psychoeducational assessment…