
Home » School district-specific complaint processes »
Adult Education SD#23, Central School Programs, Oyama Traditional School, Raymer Elementary, Rutland Middle School, Glenmore Elementary, South Kelowna Elementary, George Elliot Secondary, Dr Knox Middle School, Dorothea Walker Elementary, A S Matheson Elementary, North Glenmore Elementary, South Rutland Elementary, Bankhead Elementary, KLO Middle School, Peachland Elementary, Belgo Elementary School, Rutland Senior Secondary, Casorso Elementary, Springvalley Middle School, Pearson Road Elementary, Glenrosa Elementary, Springvalley Elementary, Mount Boucherie Secondary, Hudson Road Elementary, Bellevue Creek Elementary, Black Mountain Elementary, Helen Gorman Elementary, Okanagan Mission Secondary, Quigley Elementary, Peter Greer Elementary, Webber Road Elementary, Rose Valley Elementary, Davidson Road Elementary, Shannon Lake Elementary, Anne McClymont Elementary, Glenrosa Middle School, Ellison Elementary, Chief Tomat Elementary, Watson Road Elementary, Constable Neil Bruce Middle School, Kelowna Secondary, Rutland Elementary, Chute Lake Elementary, Mar Jok Elementary, Central Secondary, Canyon Falls Middle School, HS Grenda Middle School, Intr Hlth Adolescent Psychiatry Unit Pgm, eSchool23
Note: Policies and procedures may change over time. This review reflects the information available as of March 2026 and was compiled to the best of my understanding. Readers should consult the original district policies and bylaws for the authoritative and most up-to-date procedures. If you notice errors, please provide feedback via the form below.
This page explains how School District 23 (Central Okanagan) expects parents, students, and community members to raise concerns or pursue formal appeals. The district provides a staged dispute resolution process embedded within Policy 460 – Appeals, followed by a formal Board appeal process under section 11 of the School Act.
SD23 frames complaints as a process grounded in fairness and good faith problem-solving.
The district emphasises:
Parents and students are expected to work through multiple levels of discussion before accessing a formal Board appeal.
SD23 outlines a detailed, step-by-step escalation pathway that must generally be followed before a formal appeal.
Meet with the employee who made the decision to attempt resolution.
If unresolved, meet with the employee’s supervisor(s).
If still unresolved, meet with the area Assistant Superintendent.
If unresolved, meet with the Superintendent.
If the concern remains unresolved after these steps, a formal appeal may be submitted to the Board.
This structured escalation process is a required precursor to a formal appeal.
If the dispute resolution steps do not resolve the concern, a parent or student may appeal a decision of a board employee that significantly affects the education, health, or safety of a student.
Appeals are limited to decisions that significantly affect a student’s education, health, or safety.
Examples include:
Importantly:
Failure to make a decision is treated as a decision for the purpose of appeal.
To begin an appeal:
After submission:
If the appeal proceeds:
In making a decision, the Board considers:
The Board:
The decision is final, subject to rights of appeal under the School Act.
The Board may refuse to hear an appeal if:
If the Board’s decision does not resolve the matter, the decision may be appealed to the Superintendent of Achievement under section 11.1 of the School Act.
Step 1: Meet with the staff member involved
Step 2: Escalate to the employee’s supervisor
Step 3: Escalate to the Assistant Superintendent
Step 4: Escalate to the Superintendent
Step 5: Submit written Notice of Appeal (Form 460) to the Secretary-Treasurer
Step 6: Board review, possible hearing, and decision
Step 7: Provincial appeal to the Superintendent of Achievement
%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#fbfaf3', 'primaryBorderColor': '#e69632', 'lineColor': '#000000'}}}%%
%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#fbfaf3', 'primaryBorderColor': '#e69632', 'lineColor': '#000000'}}}%%
flowchart TD
A([Concern arises]) --> B[Step 1: Discuss the concern with the staff member involved]
B --> C{Resolved?}
C -- Yes --> Z([Matter resolved])
C -- No --> D[Step 2: Escalate to the principal]
D --> E{Resolved?}
E -- Yes --> Z
E -- No --> F[Step 3: Submit written Notice of Appeal<br/>to the Secretary-Treasurer of the Board<br/>within 30 calendar days of the decision]
F --> G[Notice must include:<br/>student name, address, phone<br/>current placement: school, grade, homeroom<br/>decision appealed and date communicated<br/>employee who made the decision<br/>grounds for appeal and relief sought]
G --> H{Board reviews eligibility}
H -- Board may refuse if --> I([Appeal refused in writing<br/>timelines unnecessarily extended, or<br/>applicant refused prior discussion, or<br/>decision does not significantly affect<br/>education, health, or safety])
H -- Appeal proceeds --> J[Notice delivered to Board Chair<br/>Chair directs Superintendent within 7 days<br/>to prepare an Appeal Report]
J --> K[Appeal Report completed and delivered<br/>to the Board within 30 calendar days<br/>copies provided to appellant and employee]
K --> L[Step 4: Board hearing within 30 calendar days<br/>appellant and employee may present submissions<br/>Board may question those appearing]
L --> M[Board issues written decision<br/>reported promptly to appellant and employee]
M --> N{Satisfied with Board decision?}
N -- Yes --> Z
N -- No --> O[Step 5: Provincial appeal to the<br/>Superintendent of Achievement<br/>as a new hearing under s. 11.1]
O --> P{Superintendent of Achievement<br/>receives the appeal}
P --> Q[May refer to mediator or adjudicator<br/>or summarily dismiss all or part]
Q --> R([Decision is final and binding])
If you would like to share feedback or make a correction on this page, please fill the form below.
Every parent who has sat across a table from a principal and left the meeting with nothing resolved, or who has spent three weeks drafting a letter that generated a two-line reply, knows the particular exhaustion of advocacy that moves without arriving anywhere. The BC school complaint system is not designed to be navigated intuitively.
Most district “inquiries and concerns” policies are not actually complaint procedures. They are: They prioritise institutional control and containment, not resolution, accountability, or fairness. A real complaints process answers four questions clearly: Most of the policies you’ve reviewed answer none of these well. Escalation without independence Nearly every policy follows this logic: This creates a closed loop, where each step
The duty to accommodate is the strongest legal protection parents have when a disabled child is struggling at school in British Columbia. It comes from the BC Human Rights Code, not from school policy. This guide explains: You do not need an IEP, a designation, or a perfect diagnosis to use these rights. The most important rule The Human Rights