
Home » School district-specific complaint processes »
Revelstoke Secondary, Columbia Park Elementary, Arrow Heights Elementary, Begbie View Elementary
Note: Policies and procedures may change over time. This review reflects the information available as of March 2026 and was compiled to the best of my understanding. Readers should consult the original district policies and bylaws for the authoritative and most up-to-date procedures. If you notice errors, please provide feedback via the form below.
This page explains how School District 19 (Revelstoke) expects parents, students, and community members to raise concerns or pursue formal appeals. The district provides a complaint pathway through Policy 8.3 – Inquiries and Concerns, followed by a formal appeal process governed by Bylaw 2.7 – Appeals under section 11 of the School Act.
SD19 frames complaints as a process of respectful communication and local resolution.
The district emphasises:
Parents and students are expected to follow the inquiries and concerns process before pursuing a formal appeal.
The district provides a staged, informal resolution pathway.
Concerns should first be discussed directly with the employee most closely connected to the issue (typically the classroom teacher or staff member).
If the concern is not resolved, it may be brought to the school principal, who will review the situation and attempt to facilitate a resolution.
If the issue remains unresolved, the concern may be taken to district-level administration (typically the Superintendent or designate), who will review the matter and attempt resolution.
The process is intended to resolve concerns collaboratively before escalation to a formal appeal.
If the concern is not resolved through the inquiries and concerns process, a parent or student may appeal a decision of a board employee that significantly affects the education, health, or safety of a student.
Appeals are limited to decisions that significantly affect a student’s education, health, or safety.
Examples may include:
Importantly:
👉 Failure to make a decision may be treated as a decision for the purpose of bringing an appeal.
To begin an appeal:
The Notice of Appeal must include:
Before the Board will hear an appeal:
The Board or Superintendent may also direct further attempts at resolution before proceeding.
Once an appeal proceeds:
The Board:
The decision is communicated to the parties following deliberation.
The Board may refuse to hear an appeal if:
If the Board’s decision does not resolve the matter, the decision may be appealed to the Superintendent of Achievement under the School Act.
Step 1: Discuss concern with the staff member involved
Step 2: Escalate to the principal
Step 3: Escalate to district administration
Step 4: Submit written Notice of Appeal to the Board
Step 5: Board review, possible hearing, and decision
Step 6: Provincial appeal to the Superintendent of Achievement
Official district source
%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#fbfaf3', 'primaryBorderColor': '#e69632', 'lineColor': '#000000'}}}%%
%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#fbfaf3', 'primaryBorderColor': '#e69632', 'lineColor': '#000000'}}}%%
flowchart TD
A([Concern arises]) --> B[Step 1: Discuss the concern with the staff member involved]
B --> C{Resolved?}
C -- Yes --> Z([Matter resolved])
C -- No --> D[Step 2: Escalate to the principal]
D --> E{Resolved?}
E -- Yes --> Z
E -- No --> F[Step 3: Escalate to district administration<br/>Superintendent or designate reviews the matter]
F --> G{Resolved?}
G -- Yes --> Z
G -- No --> H[Step 4: Submit written Notice of Appeal to the Board<br/>Must generally be filed within 30 days of the decision]
H --> I[Notice includes student details<br/>decision appealed<br/>date communicated<br/>employee involved<br/>grounds and remedy sought]
I --> J[Board or Superintendent may require<br/>prior discussion with the employee who made the decision]
J --> K{Prior discussion completed?}
K -- No --> L([Board may refuse to hear the appeal])
K -- Yes --> M[Superintendent or designate prepares report for the Board]
M --> N[Step 5: Board review<br/>Board considers written submissions]
N --> O{Oral hearing needed?}
O -- No --> P[Board decides based on written submissions]
O -- Yes --> Q[Board hearing<br/>parent or student may bring an advocate<br/>Board may investigate further]
Q --> R[Board issues written decision]
P --> R
R --> S{Satisfied with Board decision?}
S -- Yes --> Z
S -- No --> T[Step 6: Provincial appeal to the<br/>Superintendent of Achievement]
If you would like to share feedback or make a correction on this page, please fill the form below.
Every parent who has sat across a table from a principal and left the meeting with nothing resolved, or who has spent three weeks drafting a letter that generated a two-line reply, knows the particular exhaustion of advocacy that moves without arriving anywhere. The BC school complaint system is not designed to be navigated intuitively.
Most district “inquiries and concerns” policies are not actually complaint procedures. They are: They prioritise institutional control and containment, not resolution, accountability, or fairness. A real complaints process answers four questions clearly: Most of the policies you’ve reviewed answer none of these well. Escalation without independence Nearly every policy follows this logic: This creates a closed loop, where each step
The duty to accommodate is the strongest legal protection parents have when a disabled child is struggling at school in British Columbia. It comes from the BC Human Rights Code, not from school policy. This guide explains: You do not need an IEP, a designation, or a perfect diagnosis to use these rights. The most important rule The Human Rights